Robert Harley wrote:
> The original version 1.1.0 for Unix was perfect. =:-)
>
> The Windows-aware ports had a few small increments up to 1.1.3. The
> differences were some user interface issues, small speed improvements...
I wouldn't label as "small" the modifications which allow my machine to rate
a splendid 104ki/s, compared to the initial 87ki/s --- a 20% gain. Those
people did a good job, it should be acknowledged as such. And maybe put to
use in the mainstream version for the Linux port (a 10% gain might be in
order).
-- ____________________________________________________________________ Philippe Deschamp. In medio stat virtus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 27 2000 - 19:01:35 MET